• Home
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • ENG
  • POR
  • ESP
  • Around the world
    • Sexuality & Art
  • Library
    • SPW Books & Reports
    • Monthly announcements
    • SPW Multimedia
    • Working Papers
    • Newsletters
    • We recommend
      • Papers and articles
      • Publications and resources
      • Relevant links
  • Strategic Analysis
  • Research & Politics
  • SPW Activities

Publications and resources

Independent analysis of systematic gender discrimination in the El Salvador Judicial process against 17 women accused of the aggravated homicide of their newborns

29 Oct 2015


by Jocelyn Viterna, Associate Professor Sociology, Harvard University / José Santos Guardado Bautista, Lawyer, El Salvador

FULL REPORT: http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/viterna/files/final_report_english_pdf.pdf?m=1438535000

Every defendant in the Salvadoran criminal system is guaranteed three fundamental rights by the state. First, every person accused of a crime will be presume innocent until proven guilty, in accordance with the law. Second, in cases of doubt, the judge must find in favour of the defendant. Third, the Attorney General must pursue the truth, not the prosecution of the defendant, be impatial and act with total objectivity, ensuring the law is applied correctly. In the case of 17 Salvadoran women jailed for the “aggravated homicide” of their newborn babies, these three rights have been systematically violated. This report documents the systematic discrimination against these 17 women at each moment in the judicial process. To illustrate:

The police who investigated the alleged crimes only gathered evidence that would incriminate the women, and consistently failed to gather evidence that would corroborate the women’s stories. Moreover, the police regularly let civilians – including women’s neighbours or employers – do the work of gathering evidence, thus contaminating both the scene of the crime and the crdibility of the interviews.

The judges hearing the women’s cases frequently admitted only the evidence that supported a guilty verdict, and systematically excluded evidence that supported the women’s testimony… In some cases the autopsies concluded that the cause of infant death was undetermined and may have been due to natural causes, and the prosecutor was unable to show any motive for why the mother would want to kill her child. Despite this paucity of evidence, the judges still condemned the women for murder.

Categoria: Publications and resources Tags: abortion, abortion laws, El Salvador, latin america, reproductive rights

Sharing

Tag Cloud

abortion abortion laws Africa asia Brazil BRICS china contraception criminalization discrimination Egypt feminisms gender gender equality gender identity HIV HIV&AIDS homosexuality HR defenders HR regional systems human rights india intersex rights Islamic societies latin america LGBTQ rights marriage laws political economy political repression race religious discourses religious extremism reproductive rights sexual identity sexuality sexual politics sexual rights sexual violence sex work SOGI trans rights uganda UN US violence

Sexuality Policy Watch

admin@sxpolitics.org
Rio de Janeiro | Brasil
FW2 AgĂȘncia Digital